Check Your Wikipedia Profile Eligibility

Wikipedia Notability Organization Guidelines: Understanding the Requirements for Inclusion

Table of Contents

Wikipedia is one of the most popular websites on the internet, and it is often the first place people go to find information on a wide range of topics. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia aims to provide accurate, reliable information that is accessible to everyone. However, not all topics are considered in worthy of wikipedia notability enough to have an article on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia notability guidelines: A computer screen with Wikipedia logo, a list of criteria, and a checkmark next to each one

This is where the Wikipedia notability guidelines come into play. These guidelines help determine whether a topic is notable enough to warrant its own article on Wikipedia. The General Notability Guideline (GNG) is the most commonly used guideline and states that a topic must have “significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject” in order to be considered notable.

It is important to note that notability is not the same as fame or importance. Rather, it is a measure of whether a topic has received enough coverage in reliable sources to be considered worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. This helps ensure that Wikipedia remains a reliable source of information and not just a collection of random facts. In the following sections, we will explore the Wikipedia notability guidelines in more detail, including the role of reliable sources and how they are used to determine notability.

Criteria for Notability

A checklist with "Wikipedia notability guidelines" at the top, surrounded by relevant criteria and requirements

When it comes to determining whether a topic is notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia article, we follow a set of criteria known as the Notability Guidelines. These guidelines help us ensure that the information on Wikipedia is accurate, reliable, and relevant to our readers.

General Standards

The general standard for notability is that a topic must be “worthy of notice” or “significant.” This means that the topic must have received significant coverage from reliable sources that are independent of the subject. In addition, the coverage must be verifiable, meaning that it can be checked by others.

Subject-Specific Guidelines

In addition to the general standards, there are also subject-specific guidelines that apply to certain types of topics. For example, there are guidelines for notability for people, organizations, events, and creative works such as books, music, and films. These guidelines take into account the unique characteristics of each type of topic and help us determine whether they are notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia.

Secondary Sources

One important aspect of the notability guidelines is the requirement for coverage from reliable secondary sources. These are sources that are independent of the subject and provide significant coverage of the topic. Examples of reliable secondary sources include newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books published by reputable publishers. By requiring coverage from these types of sources, we can ensure that the information on Wikipedia is accurate and trustworthy.

Overall, the notability guidelines are an important tool for maintaining the quality and relevance of information on Wikipedia. By following these guidelines, we can ensure that the topics covered on Wikipedia are notable, verifiable, and significant, and that our readers can trust the information they find here.

Application and Challenges

A computer screen displaying Wikipedia's notability guidelines with a list of challenges

As editors on Wikipedia, we are tasked with ensuring that articles meet the site’s notability guidelines. However, assessing notability can be a challenging task. In this section, we will discuss some of the common issues and challenges we face when applying Wikipedia’s notability guidelines.

Assessing Notability

Assessing notability is one of the most important tasks we undertake as editors. Notability guidelines require that an article topic must have “significant coverage” in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This means that we must carefully evaluate the quality and quantity of sources to determine whether a topic meets the notability criteria.

One challenge we face when assessing notability is determining what constitutes “significant coverage.” Some topics may have many sources, but they may not provide enough depth or breadth of coverage to meet the notability criteria. Conversely, some topics may have only a few sources, but they may provide enough detail and analysis to meet the criteria.

Common Issues

One common issue we face when applying notability guidelines is dealing with topics that are controversial or have a high potential for conflict of interest. In these cases, it can be difficult to find reliable sources that provide a neutral point of view. We must be careful to avoid sources that are biased or unreliable. And we must ensure that our articles reflect a neutral point of view.

Another common issue is dealing with articles that have been nominated for deletion or merging. In these cases, we must carefully evaluate the sources and arguments presented by both sides to determine. Whether the article should be kept, merged, or deleted. We must also ensure that our decisions are consistent with Wikipedia’s notability guidelines and policies.

Dealing with Non-Notable Topics

Finally, we must also be prepared to deal with topics that do not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. In some cases, we may be able to find ways to incorporate non-notable topics into existing articles or create redirects to related topics. In other cases, we may need to delete or merge articles that do not meet the notability criteria.

Overall, assessing notability and applying Wikipedia’s notability guidelines can be a challenging task. However, by carefully evaluating sources, avoiding bias and conflict of interest, and being consistent with the site’s policies and guidelines. We can ensure that our articles meet the highest standards of quality and accuracy.

Mark Allen
Mark Allen
Mark Allen, a seasoned Wikipedia consultant, copywriter, and editor, brings a wealth of expertise to the realm of digital content creation. With a passion for precision and a keen eye for detail, Mark specializes in navigating the complexities of Wikipedia guidelines to ensure accurate and notable entries. His commitment to enhancing online visibility is reflected in his adept copywriting skills and advanced editing techniques.
Related Post

Lorem Ipsum

Lorem Ipsum

Fill out the form and we will get back to you within 24 hours